In the Classroom II
A Shift in Perspective: Why Persuasion is Vital to Success
Charles Lindbergh was a 23-year-old unknown pilot. But he persuaded
a set of backers to support his crazy idea of a solo trans-Atlantic flight
in 1927. "Lucky Lindy" didn't negotiate with the businessmen
who put up the money and equipment for his flight. He won them over. "He
persuaded St. Louis businessmen and an airplane manufacturer to believe
in his dream of flying across the Atlantic," said Wharton Professor
G. Richard Shell, academic co-director of Wharton's Strategic
Persuasion Workshop: The Art and Science of Selling Ideas program
and co-author of a new book, The Art of Woo: Using Strategic
Persuasion to Sell Your Ideas.
Persuasion and other political skills are vital to career success, even
for people who don't routinely sit down at a negotiating table.
Inside organizations, "political skills are strong predictors of
performance ratings of employees, often outstripping by far both intelligence
and personality traits," said Mario Moussa, academic co-director
of the program and co-author of The Art of Woo. Since studies
have found that 95 percent of organizations are political "to some
extent," persuasion skills are essential for survival and success.
Persuasion also is valued by markets and bosses. Research by Harvard
economist Lawrence Katz, for example, shows that markets reward people
with high social skills. Reporting on Katz's research in The New
York Times, David Brooks notes that contractors who are skilled
at working with customers more effectively can earn five times as much
as colleagues with the same technical skills. An office worker who is
charismatic and good at interactions can earn much more than a middle
manager "who
excels at routine tasks."
Negotiations, Persuasion and Influence
What
is the difference between negotiation and persuasion? Shell and Moussa's
new program and book on "strategic persuasion" grew
out of Shell's work in leading the Wharton Executive Negotiation
Workshop (and his related book on negotiations, Bargaining
for Advantage). "We found that many of the people who came
to that negotiation workshop actually had influence and persuasion
problems," said Shell.
Reporting on Katz’s research in The New
York Times, David Brooks notes that contractors who are skilled
at working with customers more effectively can earn five times as much
as colleagues with the same technical skills. An office worker who
is charismatic and good at interactions can earn much more than a middle
manager "who
excels at routine tasks."
Shell and Moussa distinguish between influence, persuasion, and negotiation.
Influence is the broadest activity. We are influencing people around
us all the time, from a firm handshake to actions that create an impression.
A homeless person screaming in the middle of the sidewalk can influence
those around him, even though he has no direct impact or power over them.
Shell recalled how his father, an Army general, drilled into him as a
child the importance of a firm handshake, recognizing that first impressions
were critical to influence.
Persuasion is influence with a goal or point of view. It is more intellectual
and reason-based than influence. Persuasion is a factor when relationship
is part of the equation. It is designed to cause other people to take
an action, or remove the obstacles that prevent them from acting. It
usually generates a win-win result. The businessmen who backed Lindbergh,
for example, shared in his triumph and drew favorable attention to their
city (his plane, of course, was called "The Spirit of St. Louis").
Negotiation, on the other hand, is a special case of persuasion — when
one side perceives a potential conflict of interest. "One side
feels that there is not enough of ‘it' to go around, so they
negotiate over ‘it,' " said Shell.
Managers need skills in all three — influence, persuasion, and
negotiation — and also need to know how and when to use each one.
Skilled negotiators, for example, know how to separate out negotiation
issues (points of conflict) and concentrate negotiations on those differences
while using persuasion skills in other areas. "You have to
be able to move between these three modes if you want to be successful," Shell
said.
Removing Barriers
Influence and persuasion
are less about arguing a case than removing obstacles. "Influence
and persuasion are not about home runs or magic," Shell said. "They
are about removing barriers. If you remove barriers, you can have your
case judged on its merits, which is the best you can do." This,
of course, won't help
a bad case. At the end of the day a masterful salesperson with a bad
product may do worse than a mediocre salesperson with a dynamite product,
no matter how persuasive.
While it might appear that the facts are the facts, this is not always
so. In a courtroom, the persuasive style of an attorney might sway the
jury to look at the facts in a certain way. "They make their decisions
based on what the facts mean to them, not on the facts themselves," Moussa
said. "You can't force people to change their minds. You
can remove the barriers. It is getting the bricks out of the way."
Once the barriers are removed, however, the decision is often easy. "People
persuade themselves," said Mario Moussa. "Look to create 'pull'
rather than pushing ideas."
From Me to We
To be effective at persuasion,
you need to see the world through the other's eyes. This shift
in perspective is captured by perhaps the shortest poem in the English
language, boxer Muhammad Ali's: "Me?
We." It is this shift that is vital to effective persuasion.
Executives in the Wharton program examined videos of notable successes
and failures in persuasion. These ranged from the hapless Yale graduate
who made a videotape touting himself for a job at a financial services
firm to the powerful connection between an Irish musician and the NAACP.
The Yale grad's self-absorbed performance not only lost him the
job, but the video made its way to YouTube where it offered an object
lesson in how not to promote yourself. In contrast, musician and "woo
master" Bono
managed to connect in a very direct and persuasive way to the audience
at an NAACP awards ceremony, despite the huge differences in background
between the Irish performer and his largely African-American audience.
"One word distinguishes the two," said Shell. "Self-awareness.
Bono was a master of self-awareness." He understood his audience
and could connect to them in an authentic way.
