August 2026 | Leadership

Athletes and Fighter Pilots Do It. Leaders Should Too.

The composure looks effortless from the outside. The surgeon’s hands steady when a complication arises. The fighter pilot easing the jet down onto a pitching carrier deck. The golfer’s tempo unhurried over a treacherous downhill putt with the title on the line. None of these moments are the result of a naturally calm temperament. They are the visible edge of work no outsider ever saw: years of conditioning and rehearsal that put the steadiness there long before the moment demanded it.

The same is required of leadership — but most leaders skip the preparation. The capacity to stay clear and decisive when conditions turn against you is not something you find in the midst of a crisis. You build it beforehand, or you discover at the worst possible moment that you do not have it.

Composure Isn’t Luck — It’s Conditioning

That capacity has a name, and it is one of the most misunderstood words in leadership. “Resilience” sounds like defense, something a leader reaches for only after things have already gone wrong. It suggests weathering a storm, absorbing a blow, holding the line until the pressure lets up. So, the leaders who would gain most from building it talk themselves out of it. They hear a word for coping, and they decide, reasonably enough, that coping is for people who are struggling. They are wrong about the word, and their mistake surfaces at the worst possible time: when they, their teams, and their organizations can least afford it.

Let’s start with what resilience is not. It is not toughness, the ability to grit your teeth and meet the moment with feigned composure. It is not a personality trait that some leaders are born with and others are not. And it is not simply bouncing back, returning to the way things were before the disruption hit (often the situation has changed so completely that the old normal is neither reachable nor worth wanting, and clinging to it is itself the failure). It is actually something harder to fake: judgment under pressure. Resilience is the ability to read a situation that has stopped behaving as planned and decide, clearly and quickly, whether to push forward, adapt the approach, or redirect effort to where it will make a difference.

And that judgment can be trained. “Resilience isn’t a trait you’re lucky enough to inherit,” says Wharton professor Samir Nurmohamed, academic director of Wharton Executive Education’s program The Resilient Leader. “It’s a set of skills, and like any skill, it can be taught, practiced, and sharpened.” The distinction is not academic. If resilience is a fixed trait, a leader can only hope to already have it. If it is a skill, it can be built — well before it is needed.

It is sometimes filed alongside grit, the perseverance for long-term goals popularized by psychologist Angela Duckworth. The two are related, but grit is the narrower idea. Grit is about pushing on. Resilience includes the harder judgment of knowing when pushing on is the wrong call, when adapting or stepping away will serve the team better than endurance for its own sake.

When the Plan Won’t Hold Still

Resilience might matter less if the next few years promised stability. They do not. “Many of the leaders I talk to can’t plan the next quarter with any confidence,” Nurmohamed says. “Geopolitical instability, economic volatility, rapid technological change: what happens at the macro level lands on teams quickly.” In that environment, resilience stops being a personal coping mechanism and becomes a non-negotiable leadership imperative.

“Many people think about resilience as something individual, how I handle stress or adversity,” Nurmohamed says. “That’s part of it. But for a leader, the harder questions are different: How do I keep my team focused? How do I acknowledge what people are carrying without losing sight of the goal? How do I plan contingencies when the future refuses to hold still?” Resilience, in this view, is less a private reserve of toughness than a set of choices a leader makes for a system: the stories told about a setback, the relationships built before they are needed, the judgment to know when to push and when to redirect.

Where the Skill Gets Built

The Resilient Leader is built to develop those skills the way they are actually learned, under pressure and in practice rather than in the abstract. The program starts at the individual level and widens to teams and organizations. Participants work through cases where high performers get knocked off course and watch how different responses produce different outcomes. In one experiential exercise, they make the kind of hard call that fractures some teams and holds others together, and feel the relational weight of it firsthand. Faculty examine how networks supply the support people lean on in adversity, since resilience is rarely a solo achievement, and how the stories leaders tell shape whether a team withdraws or adapts. An off-site session with Philadelphia’s Mural Arts program shows an organization that evolved through decades of difficulty — resilience made visible at scale.

The emphasis throughout is on application. Each participant builds a Resilience Action Plan around a real challenge they are facing now. “We want people to leave with something concrete,” Nurmohamed says. “Not just ideas, but tools and plans they can use right away.”

Which returns to the beginning. The performer’s composure isn’t the point; the preparation behind it is. Resilience is the same. It is not the thing you scramble for when things fall apart. It is the conditioning that leaders worth following build before they are tested, not during the test. “I want people to walk away understanding that resilience is a skill set they can keep developing,” Nurmohamed says, “for themselves, their teams, and the organizations they lead.”

---

Share This

Subscribe to the Wharton@Work RSS Feed